Today is: 11 February, 2012
Search
Navigation
News
- St. Bernadette's first visions of Mary at Lourdes: 11 February 1858 - This Day in History
- René Descartes: Biography of the Day
- Steroid injections prove effective in treatment of lumbar disc herniations
- Elbow position not a predictor of injury
- New data provides direction for ACL injured knee treatments
- Helmet fit critical to preventing concussion, say researchers
- Treatment for hip conditions should not rest solely on MRI scans
- Amateur football players not always keen on returning to play after ACL injuries
- PRP treatment aids healing of elbow injuries say researchers
- Delaying ACL reconstruction in kids may lead to higher rates of associated knee injuries
- Study finds elevated levels of cell-free DNA in first trimester do not predict preeclampsia
- Study finds that anti-diabetic medication can prevent the long-term effects of maternal obesity
- Kasparov-versus-computer chess match: 10 February 1996 - This Day in History
- Mark Spitz: Biography of the Day
- Could Venus be shifting gear?
- Watch ‘Mountains of snow’ on the Earth from Space programme
- Watch online: Vega qualification flight
- A career on display
- US commissions first new nuclear reactors in 30 years
- FDA unveils biosimilars guidance
I don't actually get it.
I don't actually get it. What's the point of changing the status of pluto as a planet? It has been known as a planet since time immemorial. What does it actually take to be recognized as a planet? I am hoping they just leave pluto as it is.
your wrong buddy
pluto is all ice, barely in our orbit, and cuts infront of neptune from time to time, not to mension it is 0.66% of earth, what more proof do you want, Charon is almost as big as it, and thats the moon!